What is LLM Fine-Tuning?
Table of contents
Neural networks known as Large Language Models (LLMs) undergo training on extensive internet datasets to acquire a comprehensive “world model” based on statistical correlations. These models exhibit remarkable generative capabilities across various tasks such as answering questions, summarizing documents, writing software code, and translating human language.
Nevertheless, employing LLMs within the enterprise setting necessitates harnessing their inherent power and refining their abilities to cater to specific customer requirements.
Tailoring LLMs for Specific Use Cases
To achieve this, it is essential to grasp the specific use case requiring attention and determine the most effective method for aligning the model’s responses with reliable business expectations. Several approaches exist for contextualizing a general-purpose generative model, with fine-tuning and RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) emerging as two widely recognized methods.
Understanding Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) involves enhancing system prompts (instructions given to the model) with external knowledge sources, such as an organizational document library, commonly known as a Knowledge Base. This approach is optimal for producing accurate, well-informed factual responses, minimizing instances of the model generating inaccurate information.
RAG operates by combining a retriever and a generator, allowing each component to be optimized independently. The retriever indexes the data corpus within the Knowledge Base, pinpointing relevant passages concerning a user’s query. Meanwhile, the generator utilizes this context, along with the original query, to create the final output. This modular design enhances transparency and scalability.
When is Fine-Tuning Necessary?
On the other hand, Fine-Tuning offers additional customization by incorporating new knowledge directly into the model, enabling it to learn or adapt its acquired knowledge for specific tasks. This process involves supervised learning based on labeled datasets, updating the model’s weights. Typically, the demonstration datasets consist of prompt-response pairs that specify the refined knowledge required for a particular task.
Several crucial considerations should be taken into account before determining how to tailor a generic model to meet specific business requirements. Fine-tuning becomes relevant when attempts to direct the model to execute a particular task prove ineffective or fail to consistently produce the desired outputs. The initial step in comprehending the problem or task involves experimenting with prompts and establishing a baseline for the model’s performance.
Addressing Business Needs Through Fine-Tuning
Fine-tuning becomes particularly advantageous when dealing with proprietary data, providing a heightened level of control and privacy. Instances involving sensitive data, edge cases, or scenarios where establishing a specific tone is essential may justify allowing the model to learn and adapt in an unstructured manner, rather than relying on intricately crafted prompts.
Fine-Tuning for Domain-Specific LLMs
When an out-of-the-box model lacks familiarity with domain or organization-specific terminology, opting for a custom fine-tuned model, also known as a domain-specific model, becomes a viable solution for executing standard tasks within that domain or micro-domain.
Fine-tuning proves effective when there is a need to reduce costs or latency during inference. A fine-tuned model can yield high-quality results in specific tasks with concise instruction prompts. However, it’s essential to acknowledge that interpreting or debugging predictions from a fine-tuned model is not a straightforward process. Various factors, including data quality, data ordering, and the model’s hyperparameters, may impact its performance.
The success of fine-tuning relies heavily on the availability of accurate, targeted datasets. Before embarking on the fine-tuning process, it is crucial to ensure that there is a sufficient amount of representative data to prevent the model from overfitting to limited information. Overfitting refers to a model’s restricted ability to generalize to new data.
Automating Dataset Preparation and Workflow
The preparation of datasets is a resource-intensive endeavor, and introducing automation into segments of this process is a crucial step toward establishing a scalable solution for fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) in enterprise use cases.
Consider this scenario: Suppose the goal is to tailor a model to generate social media posts aligning with the company’s marketing strategy and tone. If the organization already possesses a substantial collection of such posts, serving as golden outputs, these outputs can construct a Knowledge Base. Employing Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), key content points can be generated from this Knowledge Base. Combining these generated content points with their corresponding outputs forms the dataset essential for fine-tuning the model to excel in this new skill.
It’s essential to note that fine-tuning and RAG are not mutually exclusive; in fact, a hybrid approach combining both could enhance the model’s accuracy, warranting further investigation. A recent Microsoft study demonstrated that capturing geographically specific knowledge in an agricultural dataset, generated through RAG, significantly increased the accuracy of the model fine-tuned on that dataset.
To make fine-tuning LLMs more transparent and accessible to enterprises, simplifying each step in the workflow is crucial. The high-level workflow involves the following steps:
1. Experimenting with different LLM prompts and selecting a baseline model that aligns with the specific needs.
2. Clearly defining the precise use case for which a fine-tuned model is required.
3. Applying automation techniques to streamline the data preparation process.
4. Training a model, preferably with default values for the model’s hyperparameters.
5. Evaluating and comparing different fine-tuned models using various metrics.
6. Customizing the model’s hyperparameter values based on feedback from the evaluation step.
7. Testing the adapted model before determining its suitability for use in actual applications.